این مقاله به زبان فارسی: چرا همیشه همان دعوا را تکرار میکنیم؟ زوجدرمانی در ونکوور
Why Do We Keep Having the Same Fight? Couples Counselling in Vancouver
If you and your partner keep circling back to the same argument — about money, chores, the in-laws, how you spend weekends — you are not failing at communication. You are experiencing what researcher John Gottman calls a perpetual problem, and his longitudinal data shows that roughly 69 percent of all relationship conflicts fall into this category. These disputes do not resolve because they are rooted in fundamental differences in personality, values, or life dreams rather than in a single solvable misunderstanding. The good news: couples who learn to dialogue about perpetual problems rather than “solve” them report higher satisfaction and stay together at significantly higher rates (Gottman & Levenson, 2000). In Vancouver, where the cost of housing, bicultural pressures, and long commutes add fuel to recurring disagreements, understanding why the same fight keeps happening is the first step toward a calmer home.
What exactly is a perpetual problem in a relationship?
Gottman’s research team followed couples over 14 years and found two distinct conflict types. Solvable problems are situational — who picks up the kids on Tuesday, whether the thermostat stays at 20 or 22. They respond to compromise. Perpetual problems are different: they reflect enduring differences between two people — one partner values spontaneity while the other needs predictability; one wants closeness while the other needs personal space. Because neither person is “wrong,” the disagreement never fully closes. In a 1999 observational study published in Family Process, Gottman found that the way couples managed perpetual problems — not whether they resolved them — predicted whether the marriage remained stable over time.
The 69-percent figure does not mean the relationship is broken. It means that more than two-thirds of the things you argue about are actually invitations to understand your partner more deeply, not puzzles to fix.
Why does the same argument feel worse every time?
When a perpetual problem goes unaddressed, Gottman’s model predicts it becomes gridlocked: both partners dig in, humour and affection disappear from the conversation, and each mention of the topic triggers physiological flooding — elevated heart rate, shallow breathing, the feeling of being overwhelmed. Over months or years, gridlock breeds emotional distance. One or both partners start to believe the other simply does not care.
Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy offers a useful lens here. IFS, developed by Richard Schwartz and applied to couples work by Herbine-Blank, Kerpelman, and Sweezy (2016), proposes that each person carries internal “parts” — protectors that guard vulnerable feelings (called exiles). When a perpetual conflict touches an exile — say, a deep fear of being controlled, or an old wound around not being enough — a protector part takes over. One partner’s protector might look like loud criticism; the other’s might look like silent withdrawal. The surface topic is the dishes; the underground battle is protector versus protector, each trying to keep its person safe, and each making the other person’s protector work harder.
That is why it feels like the same fight regardless of the topic. The choreography — pursue, withdraw, escalate, shut down — is driven by parts, not by the dishes.
Wondering whether your pattern can change? You can text or call Samuel directly — no receptionist, no intake forms — at 604-721-0604 or WhatsApp.
How does couples counselling help with perpetual problems?
In session, Samuel draws on both Gottman Method interventions and IFS-informed techniques:
1. Mapping the cycle. The couple identifies the specific trigger → protector → reaction → counter-reaction loop. Seeing the pattern on paper (or on a whiteboard in session) externalises it: the enemy becomes the cycle, not the partner.
2. Gottman’s Dreams-Within-Conflict conversation. Each partner takes a turn as speaker and listener, exploring the life dream, childhood experience, or core value that fuels their position. The goal is not agreement — it is understanding. Gottman’s research showed that couples who practised this conversation moved perpetual problems from gridlock to dialogue and reported feeling “heard” even when the disagreement remained.
3. IFS unblending. When a protector part has taken over, the person is “blended” — they are the anger or the numbness. Unblending is the practice of noticing the part (“I can feel my chest tightening — that’s my firefighter part”) and gently separating from it so the person’s core Self — calm, curious, compassionate — can re-enter the conversation. When both partners are in Self, even a perpetual problem becomes a manageable difference.
4. Repair attempts. Gottman’s research identifies the repair attempt — any statement or gesture that de-escalates tension during a fight — as the single strongest predictor of relationship stability. Couples practise making and receiving repairs (“I’m sorry, that came out harsh — can I try again?”) until the skill becomes automatic.
A free 20-minute phone consultation lets you describe what is happening and hear how Samuel would approach it — no receptionist, no forms, just a direct conversation. Evenings and weekends are available. Book a call or phone 604-721-0604.
Can the same fight actually strengthen a relationship?
Paradoxically, yes. Gottman’s “masters of marriage” — the couples who stayed together and remained satisfied — did not avoid perpetual problems. They developed what Gottman calls dialogue around them: a way of returning to the topic with gentleness, injecting humour, acknowledging the partner’s perspective, and accepting influence. The 14-year longitudinal data showed that these couples’ perpetual problems stayed essentially the same over the study period, yet relationship satisfaction remained high because the affect surrounding the discussion shifted from negative to neutral or even warm.
IFS frames this as both partners learning to lead from Self rather than from protectors. When the partner who tends to pursue can say, “I notice my anxious part wants to push this — let me slow down,” and the partner who tends to withdraw can say, “I notice my shutdown part is pulling me away — I’m going to stay,” the old choreography breaks. The fight is still “about” the same thing. But the experience of having it is completely different.
What role do cultural and financial pressures play in Vancouver?
Vancouver’s housing costs, multicultural fabric, and geographic distance from extended family create a unique pressure cooker. A couple already gridlocked over financial priorities may find the tension unbearable when rent takes 40 percent of household income. A bicultural couple — one partner raised in a collectivist family, the other in an individualist one — may discover that what looks like a disagreement about holiday plans is actually a perpetual problem about whose family of origin gets priority.
Samuel works with couples navigating these intersections — including Farsi-speaking Iranian-Canadian couples and families adjusting to life in BC — and brings 25 years of clinical experience across cultures, including early career work in Red Crescent refugee camps and Canadian veterans’ programmes.
Fees and expenses are covered by ICBC, CVAP, FNHA, IFHP, RCMP, VAC, and most other insurers, and direct billing is available — so cost does not need to be the barrier that keeps a perpetual problem grinding on.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it normal for couples to fight about the same things for years?
Yes. Gottman’s research shows that 69 percent of relationship conflicts are perpetual — they stem from lasting personality or value differences and are not meant to be “solved.” What matters is how the couple manages them.
What is the difference between a perpetual problem and a solvable problem?
A solvable problem is situational (scheduling, logistics) and responds to compromise. A perpetual problem reflects a fundamental difference between two people — introversion vs. extroversion, different financial philosophies, different needs for closeness — and requires ongoing dialogue rather than a one-time fix.
What does “gridlock” mean in Gottman’s model?
Gridlock is what happens when a perpetual problem goes unaddressed for too long: both partners entrench, humour and affection leave the conversation, and even mentioning the topic triggers flooding. Gridlocked couples often feel hopeless, but the Gottman Dreams-Within-Conflict intervention is specifically designed to move them back to dialogue.
How does IFS therapy help with repeating arguments?
Internal Family Systems therapy helps each partner recognise the protective parts — the inner critic, the withdrawer, the fixer — that hijack conversations. Once a person can notice and “unblend” from a protector part, their core Self re-enters the discussion with curiosity and calm, breaking the old pursue-withdraw cycle.
How many sessions does it usually take to see a change?
Many couples notice a shift in the quality of their arguments within four to six sessions once they can name their cycle and practise repair attempts. Deeper work on the underlying exiles and attachment injuries may continue for several months, but the immediate relief of understanding the pattern often comes quickly.
Can couples counselling help even if only one partner wants to come?
Individual sessions can help one partner unblend from their protectors and change their own half of the cycle, which often shifts the dynamic enough that the other partner becomes willing to join. Samuel offers both individual and couples formats.
Do you offer evening or weekend appointments?
Yes. Sessions are available evenings and weekends, in person at the downtown Vancouver office (1300–1500 West Georgia Street) and by secure video across British Columbia.
Is couples counselling covered by insurance in BC?
Fees and expenses are covered by ICBC, CVAP, FNHA, IFHP, RCMP, VAC, and most extended health plans, and direct billing is available. A Registered Clinical Counsellor (RCC) designation qualifies under most benefit plans.
For more on how couples and family therapy works at this practice, visit the Couples & Family Therapy page.
Ready to stop replaying the same argument? Call or text Samuel at 604-721-0604, reach out on WhatsApp, or book a free 20-minute consultation. Evenings and weekends available. No receptionist, no intake forms — just a direct conversation.
جلسات به فارسی برگزار میشود.
Written with expert editorial assistance.
Sources
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work (rev. ed.). Harmony Books.
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
Gottman, J. M. (1999). What predicts change in marital interaction over time? A study of alternative models. Family Process, 38(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00143.x
Herbine-Blank, T., Kerpelman, D., & Sweezy, M. (2016). Intimacy from the Inside Out: Courage and Compassion in Couple Therapy. Routledge.
Statistics Canada. (2022). A fifty-year look at divorces in Canada, 1970 to 2020. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220309/dq220309a-eng.htm